78-02-A4: Difference between revisions
Reagan admin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Reagan admin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2"> | <TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2"> | ||
=== Transcript === | === Transcript === | ||
Last spring Major General John Singlaub, a most capable soldier with a | |||
distinguished military record was abruptly and publicly removed from his job | |||
in South Korea by the Commander-in-Chief himself. The General had expressed | |||
his views in what he thought was a private conversation, that the President's | |||
plan to withdraw our 2nd infantry division from Korea could tempt the Communists | |||
in the North to have another go at conquering the Republic of Korea. | |||
Arriving in this country, the General was summoned to appear before the | |||
House Armed Services Committee. He told the Congressmen that our intelligence | |||
reports reveal that the North Koreans have done what the Soviet Union has done-- | |||
engaged in a massive buildup of military power. And being the honest man he | |||
is, he said that removing troops from Korea would seriously weaken South | |||
Korea's ability to defend itself. | |||
Now, many months later, our State department (which from the first has | |||
supported the President's decision to withdraw the 2nd division) comes forth | |||
with a 12-page report to Congress on Korea. And, guess what? The report | |||
stresses the fact that North Korea has rejected all efforts to peacefully | |||
settle the political issues which divide the two Koreas. | |||
The report points out the "sizable military advantage" the North has over | |||
the South and the fact that North Korea's military force is obviously offensive | |||
and not defensive in nature. In tanks, armored personnel carriers, rocket | |||
launchers, artillery, and so forth, the South is outnumbered more than two-to-one. | |||
North Korea's advantage includes jet fighter planes, naval vessels and Russian | |||
missiles for use against ships. South Korea has no submarines, but Korea | |||
builds its own. | |||
Most significantly, the report--after stressing the proximity of Seoul to | |||
the North Korean border--makes it plain that South Korea could survive an attack | |||
with our help. They will have to have air, naval and logistic support. The | |||
report goes farther and says steps must be taken to "replace the combat | |||
capability of the U.S. ground forces we are going to withdraw." We must build | |||
up South Korea's stores of ammunition and equipment, send more and better tanks | |||
and anti-tank weapons; there must be an increase in South Korea's capability | |||
to utilize sophisticated weaponry and still -- with all that -- they would need | |||
our active participation if war should come. | |||
The report doesn't come right out and say it, but it strongly implies we'd | |||
be better off if the U.S. 2nd infantry division stayed right where it is. | |||
In other words, General Singlaub knew what he was saying! The presence of our | |||
troops in South Korea could very well mean the difference between peace and war. | |||
This is Ronald Reagan. | |||
Thanks for listening. | |||
</TD> | </TD> | ||
<TD WIDTH="10%" ROWSPAN="2"> </TD> | <TD WIDTH="10%" ROWSPAN="2"> </TD> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 20 January 2026
- Main Page \ Reagan Radio Commentaries \ 1978
| << Previous Broadcast | Next Broadcast >> |
Korea[edit]
Transcript[edit]Last spring Major General John Singlaub, a most capable soldier with a distinguished military record was abruptly and publicly removed from his job in South Korea by the Commander-in-Chief himself. The General had expressed his views in what he thought was a private conversation, that the President's plan to withdraw our 2nd infantry division from Korea could tempt the Communists in the North to have another go at conquering the Republic of Korea. Arriving in this country, the General was summoned to appear before the House Armed Services Committee. He told the Congressmen that our intelligence reports reveal that the North Koreans have done what the Soviet Union has done-- engaged in a massive buildup of military power. And being the honest man he is, he said that removing troops from Korea would seriously weaken South Korea's ability to defend itself. Now, many months later, our State department (which from the first has supported the President's decision to withdraw the 2nd division) comes forth with a 12-page report to Congress on Korea. And, guess what? The report stresses the fact that North Korea has rejected all efforts to peacefully settle the political issues which divide the two Koreas. The report points out the "sizable military advantage" the North has over the South and the fact that North Korea's military force is obviously offensive and not defensive in nature. In tanks, armored personnel carriers, rocket launchers, artillery, and so forth, the South is outnumbered more than two-to-one. North Korea's advantage includes jet fighter planes, naval vessels and Russian missiles for use against ships. South Korea has no submarines, but Korea builds its own. Most significantly, the report--after stressing the proximity of Seoul to the North Korean border--makes it plain that South Korea could survive an attack with our help. They will have to have air, naval and logistic support. The report goes farther and says steps must be taken to "replace the combat capability of the U.S. ground forces we are going to withdraw." We must build up South Korea's stores of ammunition and equipment, send more and better tanks and anti-tank weapons; there must be an increase in South Korea's capability to utilize sophisticated weaponry and still -- with all that -- they would need our active participation if war should come. The report doesn't come right out and say it, but it strongly implies we'd be better off if the U.S. 2nd infantry division stayed right where it is. In other words, General Singlaub knew what he was saying! The presence of our troops in South Korea could very well mean the difference between peace and war. This is Ronald Reagan. Thanks for listening. |
Details[edit]
| |||||||||||
Added Notes[edit]
|
