78-03-A4: Difference between revisions

From Ronald Reagan Speech Wiki
m (1 revision imported)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2">
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2">
=== Transcript ===
=== Transcript ===
No Transcript Currently Available
Remember swordfish, that tasty, relatively inexpensive fish that used to be
so abundant? Nowadays, of course, even if you can find swordfish on an occasional
restaurant menu, the price is right up there among the most expensive delicacies.
You can thank the bureaucrats of the Federal Food and Drug administration for that.


The story begins almost 10 years ago, in 1969. Acting on scares of mercury
poisoning from swordfish in Japan and Iraq, the F.D.A. virtually banned swordfish
in the United States. The swordfish, you see, absorbs a certain amount of mercury
normally found in the ocean. After the ban, the F.D.A. began hearings to decide
just what was a permissible level of mercury in swordfish, but it never
completed the hearings and no final rule was issued.
In 1974, the F.D.A. did publish a proposed "guideline" to establish a level
of Point Five (.5) parts-per-million for mercury in fish and shellfish. At that
time, many experts submitted comments on the proposed guideline, questioning the
scientific and legal basis for such a low permissible level of mercury. Some
argued that this level frequently exists naturally in fish and shellfish in
their normal environment.
Though the F.D.A. never issued its "guideline" in final form, it enforced
it energetically. Using so-called "emergency" procedures it began clamping
down on the fishing companies one at a time. The swordfishing business in the
United States is composed of rather small companies and most don't have the
resources to fight back against the bureaucrats. The result has been disaster
for them. Since 1969, the swordfishing business has lost approximately 90
percent of its employment and production capacity. At the same time, swordfish
has been virtually forced off the market and the consumer price of seafood
protein has shot up.
Those consequences didn't seem to bother the enforcers at the F.D.A who have
continued their actions, primarily in Boston and Florida, where the remaining
swordfishermen sail from. Recently, they went after Anderson Seafoods, a
Florida firm. This time, the fishermen decided to fight back. They banded together
assessed themselves to build a legal defense fund and Anderson Seafoods filed a
class action suit in federal court asking that the F.D.A be restrained from
enforcing its mercury "guideline" because "it has never been promulgated in final
form; it has no basis in law or scientific fact; and it is otherwise arbitrary,
capricious, and an abuse of discretion." Now that's a mouthful, but it was the
beginning of a successful action for the swordfishermen. They asked a public
interest law firm, the Pacific Legal Foundation, to enter the case and Pacific
Legal filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the fishermen.
Result? The federal district court ruled in favor of the fishermen and
against the Federal Drug administration. Who know, maybe the bureaucrats will
think twice before they go after the little guys.
This is Ronald Reagan.
Thanks for listening.
</TD>
</TD>
<TD WIDTH="10%" ROWSPAN="2">&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH="10%" ROWSPAN="2">&nbsp;</TD>
Line 17: Line 64:
<TR><TD WIDTH="150">Batch Number</TD><TD WIDTH="150">{{PAGENAME}}</TD></TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="150">Batch Number</TD><TD WIDTH="150">{{PAGENAME}}</TD></TR>
<TD>Production Date</TD><TD>02/20/[[Radio1978|1978]]</TD></TR>
<TD>Production Date</TD><TD>02/20/[[Radio1978|1978]]</TD></TR>
<TD>Book/Page</TD><TD>N/A</TD></TR>
<TD>Book/Page</TD><TD>[https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/public/2024-07/40-656-7386263-014-007-2024.pdf#PAGE=38 Online PDF]</TD></TR>
<TD>Audio</TD><TD></TD></TR>
<TD>Audio</TD><TD></TD></TR>
<TD>Youtube?</TD><TD>No</TD></TR>
<TD>Youtube?</TD><TD>No</TD></TR>

Latest revision as of 14:35, 21 January 2026

- Main Page \ Reagan Radio Commentaries \ 1978

<< Previous BroadcastNext Broadcast >>

Swordfish[edit]

Transcript[edit]

Remember swordfish, that tasty, relatively inexpensive fish that used to be so abundant? Nowadays, of course, even if you can find swordfish on an occasional restaurant menu, the price is right up there among the most expensive delicacies. You can thank the bureaucrats of the Federal Food and Drug administration for that.

The story begins almost 10 years ago, in 1969. Acting on scares of mercury poisoning from swordfish in Japan and Iraq, the F.D.A. virtually banned swordfish in the United States. The swordfish, you see, absorbs a certain amount of mercury normally found in the ocean. After the ban, the F.D.A. began hearings to decide just what was a permissible level of mercury in swordfish, but it never completed the hearings and no final rule was issued.

In 1974, the F.D.A. did publish a proposed "guideline" to establish a level of Point Five (.5) parts-per-million for mercury in fish and shellfish. At that time, many experts submitted comments on the proposed guideline, questioning the scientific and legal basis for such a low permissible level of mercury. Some argued that this level frequently exists naturally in fish and shellfish in their normal environment.

Though the F.D.A. never issued its "guideline" in final form, it enforced it energetically. Using so-called "emergency" procedures it began clamping down on the fishing companies one at a time. The swordfishing business in the United States is composed of rather small companies and most don't have the resources to fight back against the bureaucrats. The result has been disaster for them. Since 1969, the swordfishing business has lost approximately 90 percent of its employment and production capacity. At the same time, swordfish has been virtually forced off the market and the consumer price of seafood protein has shot up.

Those consequences didn't seem to bother the enforcers at the F.D.A who have continued their actions, primarily in Boston and Florida, where the remaining swordfishermen sail from. Recently, they went after Anderson Seafoods, a Florida firm. This time, the fishermen decided to fight back. They banded together assessed themselves to build a legal defense fund and Anderson Seafoods filed a class action suit in federal court asking that the F.D.A be restrained from enforcing its mercury "guideline" because "it has never been promulgated in final form; it has no basis in law or scientific fact; and it is otherwise arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion." Now that's a mouthful, but it was the beginning of a successful action for the swordfishermen. They asked a public interest law firm, the Pacific Legal Foundation, to enter the case and Pacific Legal filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the fishermen.

Result? The federal district court ruled in favor of the fishermen and against the Federal Drug administration. Who know, maybe the bureaucrats will think twice before they go after the little guys.

This is Ronald Reagan.

Thanks for listening.

 

Details[edit]

Batch Number78-03-A4
Production Date02/20/1978
Book/PageOnline PDF
Audio
Youtube?No

Added Notes[edit]